Fans accuse Argentina of benefiting from VAR and FIFA rulings - CHOSUNBIZ
Fans have raised concerns that Argentina has benefited from VAR interventions and FIFA's rulings in their favor, leading to accusations of favoritism.

As Argentina advances to the semifinals of the 2026 World Cup, the controversy surrounding officiating decisions has intensified, with fans accusing the team of receiving favorable treatment from VAR and FIFA. The defending champions are now facing scrutiny as perceptions grow that recent calls have favored them, leading to a wave of mockery on social media.
Social Media Backlash
Expressions such as "VARgentina" and "FIFAtina" have emerged online, suggesting that Argentina is the primary beneficiary of the video assistant referee system and FIFA's rulings during the tournament. This backlash coincides with Argentina's pursuit of a second consecutive World Cup title.
Controversial Officiating Decisions
A key incident fueling the debate occurred during Argentina's quarterfinal match against Switzerland, where forward Breel Embolo was sent off after receiving a second yellow card. Initially, the referee cautioned Argentina's Leandro Paredes for a foul on Embolo. However, after consulting with the VAR team and reviewing the play, the referee reversed the decision, determining that Embolo had simulated the foul. This led to Paredes' yellow card being rescinded and Embolo being dismissed for accumulating cautions.
As a result, Switzerland, now down to ten players, conceded two goals in extra time, ultimately losing the match 3-1 and missing out on a spot in the semifinals. This incident marked the first application of a new VAR protocol introduced at this tournament, which allows for the correction of player cautions if the referee mistakenly identifies the offender.
Criticism of VAR Protocols
Christina Unkel, a World Cup analyst for ITV and a former FIFA referee, criticized the implementation of this rule, stating that it was applied too broadly. She remarked, "This rule should never have been applied in this manner," emphasizing that it altered the very basis of the referee's original decision. Unkel expressed concern that the expansion of a protocol not sufficiently tested could lead to significant issues in officiating.
The controversy surrounding Argentina's matches has been a topic of discussion since the tournament began, and as they continue their campaign, the scrutiny over officiating decisions is likely to persist.
Source: biz.chosun.com